Coverage is not capability.
Most detection programs are built by buying the right instruments and deploying enough of them. That is coverage. Whether those instruments produce a decision when it matters is a different question. That is capability. The two are not the same, and the difference is where programs fail.
An organization can hold every instrument it needs and still not have what it thinks it has. The instrument is rarely the failure point. The failure is in the architecture that should connect a reading to a decision and a decision to a response. It is also in the distance between how a tool performs in a laboratory and how it performs in the hands of a real operator, on a real site, on a difficult day.
We work in that distance. It is the only part of the problem worth paying for.
How we think about the gapA method, not an opinion
We bring a single framework to this work.
Threshold™ is how we assess, design, field, and prove a detection program's capability, and how we keep proving it, because readiness is a condition you maintain, not a result you reach once. At its core is the Detection Readiness Cycle™.
Most engagements begin with an assessment, a clear-eyed read of whether a program delivers capability or only coverage. It is the least expensive way to find out, and often the most revealing.
Inside the Threshold frameworkOver four years, LGE has delivered portable-detection program-design technical assistance across forty-one engagements.
We do not name our people or our clients. We are known by our thinking. The Firm